What About Bubble Trance?

Fundamental coins like holo/nano/chainlink get shilled out on 4chan and reddit, which is all you need to know. they're full of bagholders desperate to sell, yet just like every other alt they're on the brink of being replaced by something that does what they do better.

Only attracting users can save alts from being worthless, speculators dont care long term, and the ones that do aren't buying outside of btc/eth. alts are short term only, and they get one chance during a bullrun. look at all the alts from 2014 that did nothing until the bullrun in 2017, they pumped, and now they're going back to zero.

If you're holding onto one of these sub-billion dollar alts that's already pumped once in a bull run before, it's over, move on.

Don't argue with them. The people on this site are complete brainlets. I got fudded shilling omg at $1, BNB at 30 cents, Walton at 50 cents. I got laughed about by about 10 people last week telling them to buy in at 440 vits because we aren't close to being finished yet.

Just the fact that so many people are calling it a pajeet pump and dump when it's been doing about 30 million in volume for the past two weeks should tell you all you need to know about the intelligence of this board.

Nobody actually purchases Holo on the BTC pair. The ETH pair is the price mover, and people buy/sell on the BTC pairing accordingly to make money off the spread. In order for the ETH pairing to take off, it has to eat all of the ETH walls and then absorb all the BTC spread traders dumping on them. This is also why volume is so high, because coins literally have to be purchased twice for the price to move.

Is it possible to find out the names of the people that own the banks, and how much they own? Clearly there must be a way, the profits go somewhere, and someone in the company must answer to the owners, or a proxy which ultimately is linked to the owners.

Also, there are rumors on the Internet that the Rothschild family alone owns $2 trillion, which would be 1% of the world's total wealth. How would one go about proving or disproving this?

Large majority of shares are owned by companies who are yet again owned by other companies. I simply can't find any face behind it, apart from the direct holders which have the most miniscule amounts. 

Is it possible to answer the questions: 

If Goldman Sachs shareholders are to make a decision, the opinion of which person is most important? 

If Goldman Sachs makes $100, which person gets the most of it?

Shadow banking is so convoluted that its become untraceable, even with the internet

These people own the funds that own the funds that own banks, with money distributed throughout the families. its pretty much impossible to trace it effectively

You will never see these people on the worlds richest people list, because they arent individuals.

Theyre bloodline families, and they are activly trying to take away the traditional family structure from societie's norms. but youll have to go to pol for that

Here's the problem with that line of thinking though. You think you repel people because you're "eccentric", but really it's because you have no dignity, and others can sense that in you. It is possible to both be an individual who doesn't live according to what other people think, and also not repel people. You just need to have some self-respect and live a somewhat dignified life. If that's not on the table, then by all means don't come whining to the internet about muh roasties and muh real love doesn't exist when you've made yourself un-loveable through your own actions.